State of Michigan
JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM governor	DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Lansing	REBECCA A. HUMPHRIES director

BILL ANALYSIS

BILL NUMBER: HB 4024, AS INTRODUCED

TOPIC: Public notification of new openings/expansion of state parks

SPONSOR: Representative John Stewart

CO-SPONSORS: N/A

COMMITTEE: Natural Resources, Great Lakes, Land Use and Environment

Analysis Done: February 23, 2005

POSITION

The Department does not support this proposed Legislation. The bill adds unnecessary delays and costs to a process already established through the Natural Resources Commission (NRC).

PROBLEM/BACKGROUND

Currently, the NRC serves as the forum for public notification for park openings and facility expansions. The Department views this current process as sufficient public notification.

DESCRIPTION OF BILL

This bill, if enacted, would require notification in writing to each affected local unit of government, any proposed opening or expansion of a State Park facility. The bill would also require public hearings for the purpose of gathering input from interested parties regarding such park openings or expansions.

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS

Pro

This legislation would provide for additional public input regarding park openings or expansions as well as establish a formal notification process relative to local governing bodies.

Con

This legislation adds a time and cost factor to a process already in place. Proposed projects and park openings could be delayed if this legislation were to be enacted. Additionally, the bill is unclear as to what constitutes “expanding a state park”. This could be interpreted to include adding facilities, purchasing lands, or other changes that affect the character of any individual park.

FISCAL/ECONOMIC IMPACT

Are there revenue or budgetary implications in the bill to the --

(a) Department

Budgetary:

Potentially significant costs for staffing, travel and meeting space would be incurred to hold public meetings. Costs for local governmental unit notifications would be minimal.

Revenue:

See above.

Comments:

Meeting requirements could be considered redundant considering the existing process of notification via the NRC.

(b) State

Budgetary:

See above.

Revenue:

None.

Comments:

None.

(c) Local Government

Comments:

Some administrative costs may be incurred if local units of government choose to respond to Department proposals.

OTHER STATE DEPARTMENTS

N/A

ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION

A similar bill, HB 5721 was introduced in 2004.

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES IMPACT

N/A

_______________________________

Rebecca A. Humphries

Director

_______________________________

Date

PRD